Review Article

The 2026 CAD/CAM Material Landscape: Zirconia, Hybrid Ceramics, and Beyond

Sasi Albujdidi Higher Institute of Science and Technology, Alrohibat, Libya. , Hesham I Habibi Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Zawia, Libya. , Wael Najem Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medical Technology, University of Zawia, Libya. , Abdusalam Lashtar Department of Health Science, Faculty of Health Science, University of Malta, Malta.
Published: 2026-06-08 17-26 https://doi.org/10.26629/ojbr.2026.04
CAD/CAM, zirconia, hybrid ceramics, resin nanoceramics, bioactive materials
Copyright (c) 2026 Sasi Albujdidi, Hesham I Habibi, Wael Najem, Abdusalam Lashtar (Author) Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Purpose: This narrative review evaluates the 2026 CAD/CAM material landscape, examining mechanical properties, clinical indications, workflows, and comparative performance of zirconia-based ceramics, PICNs, resin nanoceramics, High-performance polymers, and bioactive materials.

Materials and Methods: A comprehensive literature search across PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar (2015–2026) identified studies on clinical performance, mechanical characterization, and material-specific outcomes. Data extraction focused on flexural strength, fracture toughness, marginal adaptation, survival rates, and manufacturing requirements.

Results: Lithium disilicate and zirconia remain benchmarks for high-strength applications, with multilayer zirconia achieving dentin-like strength and enamel-like translucency. Hybrid ceramics and PICNs offer favorable machinability and biomimetic elastic moduli but are limited to single-unit restorations due to moderate flexural strength (150–300 MPa). Resin nanoceramics provide excellent chairside efficiency without sintering, though long-term data remain limited. High-performance polymers such as PEEK and fiber-reinforced composites are gaining traction for implant-supported prostheses due to shock-absorbing properties and biocompatibility.

Conclusion: The 2026 CAD/CAM portfolio offers tailored solutions across restorative indications. Material selection should be guided by mechanical demands, esthetics, manufacturing constraints, and biological compatibility rather than universal application. Future developments in bioactive and self-healing materials are expected to expand digital restoration boundaries. (Open J Biomed Res 2026;5:17-26)

References

[1] Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, Kuriyama S, Tamaki Y. A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J. 2009 Jan;28(1):44-56. doi: 10.4012/dmj.28.44.

[2] Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J. 2008 May 10;204(9):505-11. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.350.

[3] Zhang Y, Lawn BR. Novel Zirconia Materials in Dentistry. J Dent Res. 2018 Feb;97(2):140-147. doi: 10.1177/0022034517737483.

[4] Mörmann WH. The evolution of the CEREC system. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006 Sep;137 Suppl:7S-13S. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0398.

[5] Denry I, Kelly JR. State of the art of zirconia for dental applications. Dent Mater. 2008 Mar;24(3):299-307. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.05.007.

[6] Coldea A, Swain MV, Thiel N. Mechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network materials. Dent Mater. 2013 Apr;29(4):419-26. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2013.01.002.

[7] Stawarczyk B, Özcan M, Schmutz F, Trottmann A, Roos M, Hämmerle CH. Two-body wear of monolithic, veneered and glazed zirconia and their corresponding enamel antagonists. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013 Jan;71(1):102-12. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2011.654248.

[8] Eskandarion S, Neshandar M, Rokhshad R. Classifications and properties of materials for chairside computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing dentistry: a review. J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci. 2021;6(2):36-50.

[9] Nayar, Sanjna; Ganesh, R.; Santhosh, S.. Fiber reinforced composites in prosthodontics – A systematic review. Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences 7(Suppl 1):p S220-S222, April 2015. | DOI: 10.4103/0975-7406.155914

[10] Lambert H, Durand JC, Jacquot B, Fages M. Dental biomaterials for chairside CAD/CAM: State of the art. J Adv Prosthodont. 2017 Dec;9(6):486-495. doi: 10.4047/jap.2017.9.6.486.

[11] Mörmann WH, Brandestini M, Lutz F, Barbakow F. Chairside computer-aided direct ceramic inlays. Quintessence International (Berlin, Germany : 1985). 1989 May;20(5):329-339. PMID: 2756089.

[12] Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J. 2008 May 10;204(9):505-11. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.350.

[13]Jivanescu A, Codruta I, Rotar R. Chairside CAD/CAM Restorations. Dentistry. IntechOpen; 2024. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.114090

[14] Paulson, B., Thomas, A.S., Geo, A., & Chandran, D. Evolution Of CAD/CAM Materials In Prosthodontics: A Review. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2023;22(9):35-42. DOI: 10.9790/0853-2209053542

[15] Hench LL. The story of Bioglass. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2006 Nov;17(11):967-78. doi: 10.1007/s10856-006-0432-z.

[16] Zhang Y, Lawn B. Long-term strength of ceramics for biomedical applications. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2004 May 15;69(2):166-72. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.20039.

[17] Miyazaki T, Nakamura T, Matsumura H, Ban S, Kobayashi T. Current status of zirconia restoration. J Prosthodont Res. 2013 Oct;57(4):236-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2013.09.001.

[18] Material trends in digital dentistry for 2026. imes-icore Knowledge Magazine. 2025. Available at: https://www.imes-icore.com/knowledge/magazine/article/material-trends.

[19] Zhang Y. Making yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia translucent. Dent Mater. 2014 Oct;30(10):1195-203. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.08.375.

[20] Lithoz at ceramitec 2026: premiere of three material upgrades for serial production. Lithoz Press Release. 2026. Available at: https://www.lithoz.com/en/lithoz-at-ceramitec-2026.

[21] Why composite ceramics? How zirconia toughened alumina and alumina toughened zirconia differ. GGS Ceramic. 2025. Available at: https://ggsceramic.com/news-item/why-composite-ceramics.

[22] Kappert H, Peschke A, Watzke R, Schweiger M, Höland W. Ceramics as biomaterials for dental restoration Expert Review of Medical Devices. 2008;5(6):729-745. doi:10.1586/17434440.5.6.729

[23] Ling X, Huang L. Survival rates of CAD/CAM ceramic dental restorations: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2026 Jan 23;105(4):e47221. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000047221.

[24] Physical and chemical characterization of experimental newly formulated polymer infiltrated lithium disilicate ceramic network versus polymer infiltrated feldspathic ceramic network. BMC Oral Health. 2025;25:6134.

[25] Lava Ultimate CAD/CAM restorative technical data sheet. 3M ESPE. St. Paul, MN, USA.

[26] Kurtz SM, Devine JN. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials. 2007 Nov;28(32):4845-69. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.013.

[27] everX Posterior technical product information. GC Corporation. Tokyo, Japan. https://www.gc.dental/europe/sites/europe.gc.dental/files/products/downloads/everxposterior/ifu/3191_IFU_everX_Posterior_E.pdf

[28] Nayar S, Ganesh R, Santhosh S. Fiber reinforced composites in prosthodontics - A systematic review. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2015 Apr;7(Suppl 1):S220-2. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.155914.

[29] Ramnarayan BK, Nagral SM, Nanaiah P, Satelur KP, Venkatasubramanian R, Avinash J. Revolutionizing dental restorations: Insights into computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing materials - A systematic review. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2025 Dec 30;22:52. doi: 10.4103/drj.drj_286_25.

[30] Chairside CAD/CAM materials: what are the pros, cons, and indications. Dental Products Report. 2024. Available at: https://www.dentalproductsreport.com/view/chairside-cad-cam-materials.

[31] Material trends in digital dentistry for 2026. imes-icore Knowledge Magazine. 2025. https://www.imes-icore.com/knowledge/magazine/article/material-trends

[32] Hench LL. The story of Bioglass. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2006 Nov;17(11):967-78. doi: 10.1007/s10856-006-0432-z.

[33] Khan AA. Self-healing dental biomaterials: bioinspired pathways to sustainable dentistry. Biomater Investig Dent. 2025 Dec 29;12:45229. doi: 10.2340/biid.v12.45229.

[34] Zhang J, Pou P, Hodásová L, Yarahmadi M, Elizalde S, Cabrera J-M, et al. Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramic Network Produced by Direct Ink Writing: The Effects of Manufacturing Design on Mechanical Properties. Ceramics. 2024; 7(2):436-451. https://doi.org/10.3390/ceramics7020028

[35] Lithoz at ceramitec 2026: premiere of three material upgrades for serial production. Lithoz Press Release. 2026. https://www.lithoz.com/en/lithoz-at-ceramitec-2026-premiere-of-three-material-upgrades-for-serial-production-at-the-years-global-hotspot-for-ceramic-am/

[36] Topdagi B, Kurum M, Guler CC, Abo Haoran M. Comparison of Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Zirconia and Lithium Disilicate Prostheses: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Biomimetics (Basel). 2025 Nov 5;10(11):740. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics10110740.

[37] Ceddia M, Romasco T, Pietro ND, Cipollina A, Piattelli A, Lamberti L, et al. Quantifying Stress Shielding in Dental Implants: A Comparative Finite Element Study of Titanium, CFR-PEEK, and Ceramic Materials. Materials (Basel). 2026 Feb 26;19(5):869. doi: 10.3390/ma19050869.

[38] Naghavi SA, Lin C, Sun C, Tamaddon M, Basiouny M, Garcia-Souto P, et al. Stress Shielding and Bone Resorption of Press-Fit Polyether-Ether-Ketone (PEEK) Hip Prosthesis: A Sawbone Model Study. Polymers (Basel). 2022 Oct 29;14(21):4600. doi: 10.3390/polym14214600.

[39] Zailai A, Mubarki O, Alobaidan AN, Alenazi SA, Humedi AA, Alshahrani KM, et al. Clinical Efficacy of Bioactive and Smart Restorative Materials in Preventing Secondary Caries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus. 2026 Jan 24;18(1):e102221. doi: 10.7759/cureus.102221.