Systematic Review

Identification of the core characteristics of observer reactions to facial prosthetics on/in people following head cancer or traumatic injury: A systematic review

Caroline A. Reed Maxillofacial Prosthetics, Academic Centre of Reconstructive Science, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3977-6044 (unauthenticated) , Sam Harding Research and Development, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5870-2094 (unauthenticated) , Jonathan San Diego Centre for Dental Education, Faculty of Dentistry, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5241-4470 (unauthenticated) , Trevor Coward Academic Centre of Reconstructive Science, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7122-7980 (unauthenticated)
Published: 2025-07-16 23-29 https://doi.org/10.26629/ijmp.2025.06
Facial, Prosthetics, Reactions.
Copyright (c) 2025 Caroline A. Reed, Sam Harding, Jonathan San Diego, Trevor Coward (Author) Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Purpose: A person’s face reflects personality, identity and emotions, is often the most visible part of the body and is of critical importance during interaction. Loss of a facial part following cancer surgery or trauma can leave a person with a significantly altered appearance. Rehabilitation may include provision of a facial prosthesis and, to make a fully informed decision, patients must understand how others may react to prostheses. This systematic review aims to investigate how facial prosthetics impact observer reactions.
Materials and methods: A comprehensive Mesh search string was conducted for OVID MEDLINE, APA PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CINAHL and ERIC, including any image/interaction with any person wearing a facial prosthetic, real or edited (excluding intraoral); a control group/internal controls must be stated. Narrative synthesis was planned due to the expected heterogeneity of outcome measures.
Results: The search identified 2663 titles, sixteen made it to full text review, all of which were excluded for not meeting the inclusion criteria.
Conclusions: This systematic review highlights a lack of information in this specific area of research that may be of great benefit to patients considering facial prostheses, clinicians treating these patients and support groups helping individuals cope with their changed appearance. (Int J Maxillofac Prosthetics 2025;8:23-29)

References

Similar Articles

1-10 of 44

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)